The Happening Game: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* I recall Raven from the role of judge, then I make myself judge, filling the void. [[User:Olive|Olive]] ([[User talk:Olive|talk]]) 10:19, 30 November 2025 (UTC) | * I recall Raven from the role of judge, then I make myself judge, filling the void. [[User:Olive|Olive]] ([[User talk:Olive|talk]]) 10:19, 30 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
** judgement: this doesn't happen. I called "no-double-recallsies", so the role of judge cannot be recalled twice in a row. [[User:Raven|Raven]] ([[User talk:Raven|talk]]) 06:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC) | ** judgement: this doesn't happen. I called "no-double-recallsies", so the role of judge cannot be recalled twice in a row. [[User:Raven|Raven]] ([[User talk:Raven|talk]]) 06:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC) | ||
*** there exists a disagreement between raven and olive. no party to a disagreement should be able to judge that disagreement; therefore raven is temporarily un-judged for the duration of this case. now the role of judge is empty so i appoint myself judge to fill the void.<br/><br/>judgement: raven's "no-double-recallsies" holds. olive is prevented from recalling her, and does not become judge.<br/><br/>with that resolved, raven is re-judged. the judges are now raven and rebecca. [[User:rebecca|<span style="color:#df73ff">'''rebecca'''</span>]]<sup>[[user talk:rebecca|talk]]</sup> 08:07, 1 December 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:08, 1 December 2025
Rules of the Happening Game
- if something has happened before, and it happens again, it has to happen the same way as last time.
- if something hasn't happened before, you can make it happen the way you like.
- when there's a disagreement, the judges decide what has and hasn't happened, how, and why.
- it is not possible to win the happening game.
Happenings of the Happening Game
- I make myself the only judge. rebeccatalk 17:39, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- I take a slice of cheese from the cheeseboard. Olive (talk) 21:11, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- I take a slice of cheese from the cheeseboard and a slice of burger from the burgerboard. I combine the two to form cheeseburger. I place the cheeseburger on Mornington Crescent rebeccatalk 21:14, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
- I place rebecca on Morington Crescent Raven (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- I make myself the only judge. Raven (talk) 01:19, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- judgement: this didn't happen. when a role is vacant, anyone can fill that void. but now there's already a judge, so this wasn't the same way as before.
additionally, if anyone could become the only judge at any time, this would be fairly game-breaking, and i am interpreting against anything that breaks the game. rebeccatalk 09:30, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- judgement: this didn't happen. when a role is vacant, anyone can fill that void. but now there's already a judge, so this wasn't the same way as before.
- I grant Rebecca and Raven a piece of bismuth each for their offerings to Mornington Crescent. Olive (talk) 09:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- As Olive, I create a dozen olives. Olive (talk) 09:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- I perform a new action: I recall rebecca from the role of judge. then, I make myself the only judge. additionally, I call "no-double-recallsies" Raven (talk) 09:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- I summon 256 Mucilaginous Spirits. Raven (talk) 09:57, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- as raven, I create a dozen ravens. Raven (talk) 10:06, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- I recall Raven from the role of judge, then I make myself judge, filling the void. Olive (talk) 10:19, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- judgement: this doesn't happen. I called "no-double-recallsies", so the role of judge cannot be recalled twice in a row. Raven (talk) 06:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- there exists a disagreement between raven and olive. no party to a disagreement should be able to judge that disagreement; therefore raven is temporarily un-judged for the duration of this case. now the role of judge is empty so i appoint myself judge to fill the void.
judgement: raven's "no-double-recallsies" holds. olive is prevented from recalling her, and does not become judge.
with that resolved, raven is re-judged. the judges are now raven and rebecca. rebeccatalk 08:07, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- there exists a disagreement between raven and olive. no party to a disagreement should be able to judge that disagreement; therefore raven is temporarily un-judged for the duration of this case. now the role of judge is empty so i appoint myself judge to fill the void.
- judgement: this doesn't happen. I called "no-double-recallsies", so the role of judge cannot be recalled twice in a row. Raven (talk) 06:17, 1 December 2025 (UTC)